Introduction

The TDK Corporation C1005X7R1H104K050BE is a surface mount multilayer ceramic capacitor (MLCC) with a nominal capacitance value of 100n with ±10% tolerance. These capacitors are known for their reliability and performance, making them suitable for a variety of applications. In this review, we will analyze the performance of the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor, comparing it against a statistical benchmark formed from other components of the same value.

• ±10% tolerance meets industry standards
• Good capacitance values at various test frequencies
• Optimal performance at lower test frequencies

• High series resistance at higher test frequencies
• Increased dissipation factor along with test frequency
• Capacitance values start to decrease at higher frequencies

Note that the capacitor's nominal performance may be slightly different than the given data due to manufacturing tolerances. In addition, the capacitor's actual performance may vary depending on the specific application and circuit in which it is used. To provide a comprehensive review, we will analyze the capacitance, series resistance, dissipation factor, and quality factor of the TDK C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor, eventually concluding with a comparative analysis.

Impedance

The C1005X7R1H104K050BE ceramic capacitor exhibited a lower than average impedance across a range of test frequencies when compared to the benchmark at 1 Volt. In most cases, the impedance values lie closer to the minimum values registered within the benchmark data, indicating a favorable performance for specific applications. For instance, at a test frequency of 5 kHz, the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor recorded an impedance of 305.3 Ohms, which was close to the benchmark minimum of 278 Ohms. Furthermore, at 100 kHz, the capacitor exhibited an impedance of 17.3 Ohms, well below the benchmark average of 18.07 Ohms.

This favorable trend for the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor continues at a test voltage of 10 Volts, where it displays lower impedance values when compared to the benchmark data. Across all tested frequencies at this voltage, the capacitor's impedance values remained lower than the respective benchmark averages. For example, at 50 kHz and 10 Volts, the capacitor demonstrated an impedance of 28.9 Ohms, notably lower than the benchmark average of 34.91 Ohms.

The consistently lower impedance values exhibited by the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor throughout the entire range of test frequencies at both 1 Volt and 10 Volts are a testament to its exceptional performance. This characteristic is particularly beneficial for design engineers seeking capacitors that minimize impedance-related effects in their circuits, which in turn allows for improved signal integrity and reduced overall losses. The C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor's consistent performance within the Ceramic: X7R composition category also adds to its reliability, allowing for a wider array of potential applications in various electronic devices.

Capacitance

At 1 Volt, the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor demonstrates higher Series Capacitances (Farads) across all test frequencies when compared to the respective average benchmark values. For example, at a test frequency of 5 kHz, the capacitor measures a capacitance of 104.4n against an average benchmark value of 101.8n. This trend continues throughout the entire range of test frequencies, with the most significant difference being at 50 kHz, where the capacitor measures 94.12n compared to the average benchmark value of 91.32n.

Interestingly, the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor maintains consistently higher Series Capacitances than the benchmark statistics at 10 Volts as well. For instance, at the frequency of 100 kHz, the capacitor measures 104.4n against the average benchmark value of 88.4n. At 1 MHz, the difference in capacitance is still considerable, with the capacitor measuring 88.1n compared to the average benchmark value of 82.53n.

It is essential to have a capacitor with the desired capacitance value for specific applications in electronic circuits. Higher capacitance values can improve the performance in filtering, decoupling, and energy storage applications. Furthermore, a capacitor with consistent capacitance values over a wide range of frequencies ensures reliable performance and circuit stability.

When evaluating the overall capacitance performance of the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor, it consistently outperforms the statistical benchmark data across the complete range of test frequencies. This capacitor could be a strong candidate for electronic engineers who are looking to optimize circuit performance, thanks to its superior Series Capacitances at both 1 Volt and 10 Volts as compared to the benchmark statistics. The high capacitance values also indicate the quality of the dielectric material used and the manufacturing processes involved, which contribute to the overall reliability and durability of the component.

Series Resistance

In this review, we analyze the series resistance of TDK Corporation's C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor. Comparing the component's inductor-capacitor-resistor (LCR) measurements with the provided statistical benchmark data at 1 Volt, the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor demonstrates better performance than the benchmark average across all test frequencies. The most noticeable improvements occur at frequencies including 50 Hz, 100 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1 kHz, where the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor outperforms the benchmark average by a relatively large margin. For instance, at a 50 Hz test frequency, the component's series resistance measures at 736.2 Ohms, significantly lower than the benchmark average of 865 Ohms. This trend continues through the 1 kHz range, highlighting the capacitor's enhanced performance relative to others with the same value.

When measured at 10 Volts, the series resistance of the C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor remains consistently lower compared to the benchmarking data for frequencies up to and including 100 kHz. However, beyond this point, not enough data is available to draw meaningful comparisons with the benchmark.

The C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor offers a competitive advantage in terms of lower series resistance across various test frequencies, compared to the statistical benchmark of similar components. Given the importance of series resistance in circuit design, this capacitor could be a suitable choice for electronics engineers searching for capacitors with superior performance in this aspect.

Lower series resistance is essential for ensuring efficient operation of electronic circuits and reducing unwanted heat generation or dissipation due to losses. It also helps improve the overall power factor and the lifespan of a capacitor. This analysis of TDK Corporation's C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor's series resistance indicates that it can offer several benefits to engineers working on circuit designs requiring high-performance components, and it could potentially enhance the performance of the designed circuit.

Dissipation Factor and Quality Factor

The LCR measurements conducted at 1 Volt and 10 Volts provide insights into the capacitor's performance in terms of its Dissipation Factor (Df) and Quality Factor (Q). These two parameters are essential in evaluating a capacitor's efficiency, as it relates to its ability to store and release electrical energy.

From the conducted tests, the capacitor exhibits a low Df, which is an indication of its good energy storage efficiency. In the 1V test, Df values range from 0.016 to 0.027 over a frequency range of 150 kHz to 1 MHz. This is notable since a lower Df indicates less energy loss during operation. The minimum Df value of 0.016 is achieved at higher frequencies of 150 kHz, 200 kHz, and 250 kHz. At 10V, the observed Df values are relatively higher, ranging from 0.036 to 0.055 between 200 kHz and 20 kHz. Nevertheless, the Df remains stable throughout the frequency range tested, indicating consistency in energy storage efficiency.

Similarly, the Quality Factor (Q) results shed light on the capacitor's performance over various frequencies. A higher Q value represents a lower energy loss rate and thus, better overall performance. In the 1V LCR measurement, Q values vary from 37.16 at 1 MHz to 62.24 at 150 kHz—most of the measured frequency range has Q values higher than 40. This indicates excellent performance across a broad frequency range.

For the 10V test, there is a decrease in Q values in comparison to 1V, ranging from 18.89 at 5 kHz to 32.82 at 550 kHz. Despite the comparatively lower Q values, they remain mostly stable as the test frequency increases, signifying that the capacitor's performance is consistent even at higher voltage levels.

In summary, both the Df and Q data obtained from the LCR measurements highlight the capacitor's ability to maintain efficient performance and stable energy storage across various frequencies and voltage levels. This suggests its suitability for applications requiring reliable energy storage and release with minimal energy loss.

Comparative Analysis

Conclusion

In the evaluation of TDK Corporation's Ceramic: X7R capacitor, C1005X7R1H104K050BE, several performance aspects were compared to the statistical benchmark data of capacitors of equal value, taking into account LCR measurements at 1 and 10 Volts.

When examining impedance, the component outperforms the average impedances at lower voltages across the majority of test frequencies. Dissipation Factor holds a good consistency, with measurements at 1 Volt close to the average benchmarks, but increasing slightly at 10 Volts. In terms of Quality Factor, the component delivered mixed performances, surpassing the minimum benchmark throughout the test frequencies but staying below the average Quality Factor values and significantly below maximum.

Series Resistance measurements showcased a performance slightly below benchmark averages at most of the test frequencies. Meanwhile, Series Capacitance results are above average for lower test frequencies, especially at 5 kHz and 10 kHz, but leveling off as the test frequency increases.

Overall, the TDK Corporation C1005X7R1H104K050BE capacitor provides a balanced performance, showing both strengths and areas for potential improvement when compared to the statistical benchmark values. Engineers considering incorporating this component in their circuits should weigh its benefits and assess if this capacitor is the right fit for the intended application.