Reviews & Analysis

TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic Capacitor: Performance Analysis and Insights

By Mark Harris Monday, 10 April 2023

Delve into the captivating performance analysis of the TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic X7R Capacitor with a 100nF nominal value. Discover how this surface mount 0603 package component performs in various aspects such as impedance, capacitance, series resistance, and more. Uncover insights gained from our comparative analysis, allowing you to make informed decisions for your engineering projects.

Introduction

Our review focuses on TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic: X7R capacitor, offering engineers a comprehensive understanding of the component's competency, particularly in relation to its key performance. This venture primarily aims to guide engineers exploring whether or not this specific capacitor is an optimal fit for their needs. In order to assess the component's performance, we will be comparing the component data against a statistical benchmark formed from other components of the same value.

Here are some preliminary pros and cons for our component:

  • Pros:
    • Wide range of test frequencies
    • Stable capacitance
    • Quality Factor (Q) at optimal values for low-frequency applications
  • Cons:
    • Higher Series Resistance (especially at 1 Volt test condition) than benchmark
    • Dissipation Factor for high-frequency applications might be a limitation
    • Higher voltage shows reduced Quality Factor (Q)

The subsequent sections will shed further light on the Capacitance, Series Resistance, Dissipation Factor, and Quality Factor, providing valuable benchmark metrics comparisons and enlightening any notable performance disparities that might arise.

Impedance

The impedance profile of the TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA was compared to a statistical benchmark formed from other components of the same value. This analysis encompasses tests performed at 1 Volt and 10 Volts, with frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 1 MHz.

When considering the 1 Volt range, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA performs slightly above the average benchmark impedance in the low-frequency domain (5 Hz - 100 Hz). For instance, at 10 Hz, it exhibits a value of 161.2k Ohms, as opposed to the benchmark average of 157.2k Ohms. This higher impedance in the low-frequency range suggests that the capacitor might be more efficient in attenuating low-frequency noise and maintaining signal integrity within the circuit.

In the medium frequency range (500 Hz - 100k Hz), the capacitor demonstrates similar performance to the benchmark. It is important to note that capacitors exhibit their typical impedance behavior in this frequency range, where they work as efficient energy storage and filtering elements, ensuring stable and reliable signals in electronic circuits. At higher frequencies (150k Hz to 1M Hz), the capacitor tends to perform marginally below the benchmark regarding the impedance values. For example, at 1 MHz, it registers an impedance of 1.787k Ohms compared to the benchmark average of 1.958k Ohms. The values suggest that the capacitor performance progressively decreases with the increase in frequency.

At 10 Volts, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA exhibits a consistent impedance performance compared to the 1 Volt range test. Once again, the capacitor demonstrates an above-average performance in the lower frequencies, settling in line with the benchmark within the medium range and marginally below during the higher frequencies. At 100k Hz, the capacitor registers 16 Ohms, which is close to the benchmark average of 18.07 Ohms.

In conclusion, the TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA showcases a generally consistent impedance performance, which stays within close proximity to the benchmark averages across the entire frequency range. With slightly better performance in the lower frequencies and marginally lower values in the higher frequencies, the capacitor could be well-suited for engineers seeking stable and reliable performance in their circuits, particularly within applications where lower-frequency impedance is deemed most crucial for signal quality and integrity.

Capacitance

In analyzing the performance of TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic: X7R Capacitor against the statistical benchmark, several aspects must be considered. At 1 Volt, the capacitor's series capacitance values are relatively close to the benchmark's average values, indicating that the capacitor exhibits consistent performance in the low-voltage range, which is both enlightening and advantageous in planning for real-world usage scenarios.

In the low-voltage range, comparing the LCR measurements at 1 Volt for the component in discussion, it demonstrates a reasonably good alignment to the average figures of the benchmark. For example, at a test frequency of 5 Hz, the series capacitance is measured at 99.08nF versus the benchmark's average value of 101.8nF. In higher test frequencies at 1MHz, the measured capacitance value of 89.08nF is only slightly different as compared to the benchmark's average of 82.53nF. This illustrates that the component, TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic: X7R Capacitor, performs admirably across the entire range of test frequencies, which is invaluable in a variety of applications.

However, when examining the LCR measurements at 10 Volts, it is apparent that the performance characteristics begin to deviate from the benchmark's average values. Notably, in lower frequencies such as 5 Hz and 10 Hz, the series capacitance measures at 124.1nF and 123.8nF, respectively, outperforming the average figures compared to the statistical benchmark. As the test frequency increases, there is a slight decline in correlation between the capacitor's measurements and the benchmark's average values. For instance, at 100kHz, the component measures 99.4nF compared to the benchmark's 88.4nF average. This signifies that the component performance, particularly in the higher voltage setting, tends to vary from the expectations presented by the statistical benchmark.

Throughout this analysis, it is essential to keep in mind the temperature stability, reliability, performance, and endurance of the TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA Ceramic: X7R Capacitor within the context of the specific application. Engineers evaluating this capacitor should consider these distinctions across the voltage and frequency settings when integrating and applying the component in their circuits, including filtering, decoupling, energy storage, and signal conditioning, among other potential uses. This will ensure optimal performance and dependability through careful and systematic consideration of the component's characteristics and documented performance data.

Series Resistance

In this evaluation of the Series Resistance of TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Capacitor, the component demonstrates a mixed performance against the established statistical benchmark. Considering the importance of Series Resistance in capacitor performance, this analysis will help electronics engineers make informed decisions about the suitability of this component for their specific applications.

At a test frequency of 10 Hz and 1 Volt, the Capacitor's Series Resistance is 2.475k Ohms, which is lower than the benchmark average of 4.329k Ohms. This advantage continues in the higher frequency ranges, with the Series Resistance measured at 5.141 Ohms at 5 kHz compared to the benchmark average of 10.02 Ohms, indicating a relatively superior performance in the mid-frequency range.

However, at lower frequencies, such as 5 Hz, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA's Series Resistance of 5.212k Ohms is slightly higher than the benchmark average of 4.751k Ohms. This discrepancy could negatively impact the performance of the capacitor in circuitry that operates primarily in lower frequency ranges. At higher frequencies, like 1 MHz, the Capacitor performs close to the benchmark average, exhibiting a Series Resistance of 28.76 milli-Ohms compared to the average of 27.07 milli-Ohms.

Under a higher voltage of 10 Volts, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA continues to demonstrate a mixed performance when compared to the benchmark data. It performs better at lower test frequencies, with Series Resistance values of 17.58k Ohms at 5 Hz and 8.7k Ohms at 10 Hz. However, at higher test frequencies, such as 500 kHz and 1 MHz, the Series Resistance values of 62.94 milli-Ohms and 53.04 milli-Ohms, respectively, surpass the benchmark averages in those frequency ranges. Therefore, this component may not be suitable for high-frequency applications that require a lower Series Resistance.

Overall, TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA Capacitor exhibits a mixed performance in terms of its Series Resistance compared to the benchmark data. Electronics engineers should carefully review this component, its performance across various frequencies and voltages, and consider its specific applications and performance goals to determine if it meets their requirements.

Dissipation Factor and Quality Factor

In this section, we will analyze the performance of the TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor in terms of dissipation factor (Df) and quality factor (Q). These parameters are crucial in determining a capacitor's energy efficiency, losses, and overall reliability in various applications. Using the provided LCR measurements at 1V, we find that this capacitor exhibits a low Df across a broad spectrum of test frequencies, ranging from 0.011 to 0.016. In comparison to the average Df benchmarks, this X7R capacitor demonstrates exceptional performance, particularly at higher test frequencies. The low Df values indicate lower energy losses, which make this component favourable for energy-sensitive applications.

When examining the Quality Factor (Q), we observe that the Q values for this capacitor range from 61.64 to 90.82 at 1V. These high Q values reveal outstanding energy efficiency and reduced energy dissipation, establishing this component as a compelling option for engineers seeking high-quality capacitors in their projects. As a result, this capacitor is likely to contribute to the minimized losses and improved overall performance of the circuit.

Moreover, let's evaluate the LCR measurements at 10V. While the Df values are slightly higher at increased voltage, they still show impressive performance, staying between 0.018 and 0.069. The Q values showcase noteworthy performance as well, ranging from 14.47 to 55.77. This demonstrates that this capacitor maintains its exceptional energy efficiency across various voltage levels, which is crucial when selecting capacitors for diverse circuit applications. As voltage fluctuations can affect a component's properties, it is essential for engineers to consider capacitors that can retain their performance even under different operating conditions.

In conclusion, the TDK Corporation C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor demonstrates excellent energy-efficient performance backed by its low dissipation factor and high quality factor values. These parameters make it well-suited for a variety of applications where energy conservation and minimized losses are critical.

Comparative Analysis

The performance analysis of TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor underlines its strengths and weaknesses relative to the statistical benchmark data provided. The capacitor is a Ceramic: X7R component with a nominal value of 100n, ±10% tolerance, and a 50V voltage rating. The capacitor is designed for surface-mount applications and comes packaged in 0603 (1608 metric) dimensions.

When measured at 1 Volt, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA showed slightly higher impedance values at lower frequencies compared to the average benchmark values. However, approaching the 100 kHz test frequency, this gap is reduced; the impedance values become relatively closer to the averages. At higher test frequencies, the capacitor's impedance values remain within reasonable proximity to the averages.

In terms of Dissipation Factor, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA demonstrated an admirably consistent performance, showcasing values that oscillate around 0.015 for tests conducted at 1 Volt. These values are roughly half of the average dissipation factors seen in the benchmark data. This corroborates the C1608X7R1H104K080AA as an efficient component compared to its counterparts.

The same trend is recognizable in the Quality Factor values. The C1608X7R1H104K080AA exhibits a quality factor that retains a relatively steady trend at different test frequencies when measured at 1 Volt. These values are generally higher than the average quality factors from the benchmark, which underscores the component's reliability.

Furthermore, the Series Resistance and Series Capacitance values observed at 1 Volt for C1608X7R1H104K080AA remain within a comparable range to the benchmark values. The variances seen throughout the frequency range are minimal, as is the overall comparison to the statistical benchmark data.

However, the performance analysis conducted at 10 Volts reveals a notable difference in the Dissipation Factor, as seen in comparisons to tests carried out at 1 Volt. At this measurement, the Dissipation Factor falls to around 0.02, which is marginally lower than the reported average benchmark values. Therefore, a caveat to the previously mentioned efficiency can emerge if the workings include higher voltages.

Overall, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor designed by TDK Corporation retains its merit as a reliable Ceramic: X7R component within its category. Nonetheless, it remains crucial to account for the flexibility in performance, as influenced by varying voltages. Its efficiency and consistent values solidify its place among ceramic capacitors and prove its worth in applications that do not require high voltage implementation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor demonstrates variable performance when compared to the statistical benchmark. For certain test frequencies, especially at lower frequencies such as 5kHz and 10kHz, the capacitor shows better performance in terms of both impedance and dissipation factors. However, as the frequency gets higher, the performance variance tends to level out, and at some points is even surpassed by the benchmark data. To optimize the performance, refer to the section on impedance, capacitance, series resistance, dissipation factor, and quality factor.

When measuring the C1608X7R1H104K080AA at 1 Volt, it exhibits a lower impedance and quality factor in several frequency ranges. The capacitor outperforms the benchmark at lower test frequencies but loses its advantage at higher frequencies. Thus, this might be a good fit for circuits operating in a lower frequency range.

At 10 Volts, the C1608X7R1H104K080AA demonstrates variable performance and tends to perform better in terms of dissipation factor at low-to-middle frequency ranges. However, the performance is outperformed by the benchmark in some instances as the frequencies get higher.

Overall, the TDK Corporation's C1608X7R1H104K080AA capacitor demonstrates satisfactory performance for certain frequency ranges. Engineers looking for a capacitor for use in circuits operating in low frequency ranges might find this component suitable for their needs, while those needing optimal performance at higher frequencies may consider searching for an alternative.

More News
A detailed technical review of the TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF Drum Core Wirewound Inductor, focusing on its performance analysis, impedance, inductance, series resistance, and other vital parameters.
TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF: A Comprehensive Technical Review of a Competitive Drum Core Wirewound Inductor
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
Explore the performance and characteristics of the TDK Corporation VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 drum core wirewound inductor in this in-depth technical review.
TDK Corporation's VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 Inductor: A Comprehensive Technical Review
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
A comprehensive technical review on the Pulse Electronics 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT inductor, focusing on performance, impedance, inductance, and other important parameters for engineers.
Unlocking the Potential of Pulse Electronics' 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT Inductor: A Performance Analysis
Tuesday, May 30, 2023