Reviews & Analysis

Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor Review: A Deeper Look into Performance

By Mark Harris Thursday, 6 April 2023

Dive into the comprehensive performance analysis of Yageo's CC0603KRX7R8BB104 ceramic X7R capacitor. This captivating review carefully examines critical characteristics, looking at impedance, capacitance, series resistance, and more. Stay informed with a comparative analysis that evaluates its performance against similar components.

Introduction

This technical review aims to meticulously analyze the performance of Yageo's CC0603KRX7R8BB104 capacitor with a Ceramic: X7R composition against statistical benchmark data formed from other components of similar value. This Surface Mount 0603 (1608 Metric) capacitor offers nominal capacitance of 100n, tolerance of ±10%, and a voltage rating of 25V, thereby catering to the requirements of engineers searching for an optimal choice. In this review, we shall present a comprehensive evaluation by comparing the component data with the benchmark data, considering both the capacitor's positives and negatives.

Pros:
    • High nominal capacitance value
    • Ceramic: X7R composition for stable performance over temperature range
    • Wide frequency range for effective capacitance
Cons:
    • At certain test voltages and frequencies, component data does not reveal data related to Dissipation Factor, Series Resistance, and Series Capacitance
    • Deviation from statistical benchmark expected in a few parameters

    This detailed analysis will cover various performance aspects of the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor, including capacitance, series resistance, dissipation factor, and quality factor. A comparative analysis providing insights into its overall performance with respect to the benchmark data will be conducted. Interested readers can use this review as a resource to make an informed decision on incorporating the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor into their next engineering project.

Impedance

The impedance performance of the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 capacitor demonstrates a consistent alignment with the statistical benchmarks provided for the 1-volt measurement. For example, the impedance at the 5 Hz test frequency is 306.2 kOhms, which falls within the benchmark data range of 278 k - 345.9 kOhms. Similarly, at the 10 Hz test frequency, the capacitor has an impedance of 153.5 kOhms, aligning with the benchmark range of 139.3 k - 173 kOhms. This adherence to benchmark ranges is observed consistently for all test frequencies up to 1 MHz, where the impedance measure is 1.724 kOhms and the benchmark range is 1.666 k - 2.837 kOhms.

Impedance is a critical parameter that should be considered during the selection and design phase of an electronic circuit, as it can affect the overall performance and stability of a system. A capacitor with an impedance tailored to the requirements of a particular application will contribute to achieving optimal performance and efficiency.

When comparing the capacitor's impedance performance at 10 volts with the available 1-volt benchmarks, it is important to note that the impedance values are consistently lower at all test frequencies. For instance, at the 5 Hz test frequency, the impedance measured at 10 volts is 249.9 kOhms, which is notably lower than the average impedance value observed at 1 volt (313.4 kOhms). This pattern remains true across all test frequencies up to 1 MHz. However, it must be emphasized that comparing measurements at different test voltages may not provide a completely accurate representation of the capacitor's performance due to the inherent dependency of impedance on the applied voltage. Consequently, using benchmark data for different test voltages would be more appropriate to obtain a precise insight into the performance and behavior of this capacitor across different operating conditions.

Capacitance

In this section, we will examine the capacitance performance of the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor at 1 Volt and 10 Volts across a range of frequencies from 5 Hz to 1 MHz. We will then compare the obtained results against statistical benchmark data derived from similarly valued components in the Ceramic: X7R category.

Starting with the LCR measurements at 1 Volt, we observe series capacitance values ranging from 104n at 5 Hz to 92.32n at 1 MHz. Remarkably, the capacitor consistently exhibits higher series capacitance than the average benchmark values from 5 Hz to 900 kHz. The differences vary between 2.2n at 5 Hz and 9.79n at 100 kHz. However, at 1 MHz, the difference narrows to a mere 0.47n compared to the benchmark's average, indicating performance close to the benchmark at this extreme of the frequency range.

Moving on to the capacitor's performance at 10 Volts, we observe a similar trend of higher capacitance values compared to the benchmark's average across the tested frequencies. Values range from 127.6n at 5 Hz to an unreported value after 650 kHz. The capacitance difference starts at 25.8n at 5 Hz, peaks at 16.1n at 50 kHz, then decreases to 12.4n at 100 kHz. The values steadily decline further until stabilizing at 14.43n between 550 kHz and 650 kHz.

In summary, the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor demonstrates higher-than-average capacitance values compared to similar components across the entire tested frequency range at both 1 Volt and 10 Volts. This robust performance profile makes it well-suited for applications within the Ceramic: X7R category that require increased capacitance values within the evaluated frequency range.

Series Resistance

In this section, we will analyze the capacitor's performance by comparing its series resistance values at 1V and 10V testing frequencies with the provided benchmark data. We will examine two sets of series resistance values at these testing frequencies.

At the 1V testing frequency, the capacitor performs better than the average series resistance values at test frequencies ranging from 5Hz to 600kHz. For instance, at 50Hz, the series resistance is 477.4 Ohms, which demonstrates a significant improvement over the average benchmark resistance of 865 Ohms. At 5kHz, the series resistance is 5.552 Ohms, while the average benchmark value is 10.02 Ohms. Similarly, at 600kHz, the capacitor under analysis has a series resistance of 44.85m Ohms, compared to the benchmark average value of 93.98m Ohms.

Despite the capacitor's notable performance relative to average benchmark values, it exhibits higher series resistance values compared to the benchmark minimum values across all test frequencies at 1V. For instance, the series resistance at 1kHz is 26.13 Ohms, while the benchmark minimum resistance is 15.06 Ohms. This finding suggests that while the capacitor's performance is notable compared to benchmark averages, it is not optimal when considering the minimum series resistance values across test frequencies.

At the 10V testing frequency, the capacitor's series resistance values consistently fall short compared to the benchmark average values. For example, at 50kHz, the series resistance is 1.264 Ohms, whereas the average benchmark value is 1.039 Ohms. Similar disparities can be observed across other test frequencies as well. This reveals that the capacitor's performance at a higher testing voltage is not as impressive as its performance at the lower 1V testing frequency.

Overall, the analysis of the series resistance values provides valuable insights into the capacitor's performance relative to the benchmark data. It allows us to understand the component's strengths and weaknesses within the context of various testing frequencies and voltages, contributing to informed decision-making in using this capacitor in electronic applications.

Dissipation Factor and Quality Factor

In this section, we examine the dissipation factor (Df) and quality factor (Q) of the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 ceramic capacitor with an X7R dielectric. Both factors significantly impact the signal loss and stored energy capabilities of the component, making them essential factors to understand when evaluating its performance under various conditions.

By comparing the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 capacitor to a statistical benchmark in terms of Df and Q, we can identify trends that reveal its performance under different measurement scenarios. Specifically, we assess these trends by observing the performance at varied test frequencies and with LCR measurements obtained at either 1 Volt or 10 Volts.

When considering the 1 Volt LCR measurements, the capacitor exhibits a generally low dissipation factor, ranging from 0.013 to 0.018. This low Df is beneficial as it minimizes energy loss, ultimately contributing to better overall performance. At the same time, the quality factor values are between 54.96 and 75.87 across the test frequencies. These values indicate average energy storage capabilities when compared to the benchmark, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the component's behavior.

As we explore the LCR measurements at 10 Volts, the capacitor's dissipation factor sees a slight increase, ranging from 0.022 to 0.063. While higher than at 1 Volt, this increase still lies within acceptable tolerances and confirms that the capacitor maintains only a marginally higher energy loss when subjected to a voltage of 10 Volts. It is crucial to note that the quality factor values decrease substantially in this case, moving between 16.37 and 44.88. This decline in Q values suggests a decrease in the energy storage capabilities of the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 capacitor when operating at 10 Volts.

Comparative Analysis

The Capacitor being analyzed is the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104, a Ceramic: X7R Capacitor with a 100n nominal value and ±10% tolerance. Comparing the component's performance across various parameters at 1 Volt against the statistical benchmark data, we can generate a comprehensive comparative analysis.

Starting with Impedance, the CC0603KRX7R8BB104, at most frequencies, shows a lower value than both the average and maximum impedance in the benchmark data. At a high test frequency of 100kHz, it is noteworthy that the Impedance drops to 16.7k Ohms, outperforming the average (18.07k Ohms) and lowest (16.26k Ohms) readings of the benchmark data. This trend continues when measured at an increased voltage of 10 Volts, illustrating the component's stable performance.

Examining the Dissipation Factor (DF), we observe the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 to have lower DF values across all test frequencies in comparison to the benchmark average and maximum. The consistent behavior of having a low DF showcases the Capacitor's low energy loss. Looking at the Quality Factor (Q), the trend seems to be inversed. Most values for the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 are below the benchmark average, implying a higher energy loss, which is somewhat at odds with the Dissipation Factor findings.

Next, we observe the Series Resistance (Rs) of the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 to be lower than benchmark data across all test frequencies at 1 Volt. Even at highly increased frequencies like 100kHz, the Capacitor exhibits a lower Rs value (221.8m Ohms) compared to the benchmark averages and minimums. This trend is also apparent at a higher voltage of 10 Volts, where its values outperform most benchmark data. The low Series Resistance denotes an enhanced energy transfer efficiency.

In terms of Series Capacitance (Cs), the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 closely mirrors the benchmark average values throughout the different frequencies, indicating stable and predictable performance across the spectrum. While not surpassing the benchmark, this consistency plays an advantage when designing products requiring exceptional stability.

Overall, the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor outperforms the statistical benchmark in several key parameters - lower Impedance, reduced Dissipation Factor, and a markedly lower Series Resistance - while maintaining stability in the Series Capacitance. The conflicting findings between the Quality Factor and Dissipation Factor suggest some unforeseen factor or inconsistency but do not overshadow the generally positive performance indicators. The CC0603KRX7R8BB104 can be a valuable component choice for degreed engineers exploring a reliable and efficient Capacitor performance for their products.

Conclusion

In our technical review of the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Ceramic X7R Capacitor, we have meticulously analysed its performance compared to the statistical benchmark data collected from other components of the same value. The manufacturer's specifications indicate that this is a 100nF, ±10% tolerance, 25V rated surface mount device in a 0603 (1608 Metric) package.

When tested at 1 Volt, the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 delivered an impedance below the average for most test frequencies but started to exhibit a higher Dissipation Factor near the higher end of the frequency range. However, the Quality Factor remains within acceptable range across the board, which demonstrates a reasonable performance in terms of energy loss. The Series Resistance followed a similar trend, offering consistent results across test frequencies. Comparing the capacitance values at 1 Volt, the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 maintains a close correspondence with the benchmark data.

Under 10 Volts testing, the device manifested higher impedance values and an increased Dissipation Factor compared to the results at 1 Volt. While the Quality Factor remains satisfactory at lower frequencies, there seems to be a slight decline in the higher frequency range. The Series Resistance exhibited a consistent behavior in this case as well.

In conclusion, the Yageo CC0603KRX7R8BB104 Capacitor demonstrates a satisfactory performance across the majority of the frequency range, aligning relatively well with the statistical benchmarks. Its primary drawback is the increased Dissipation Factor at higher frequencies, especially when tested at 10 Volts, which may impact certain applications. Engineers should take these factors into account when considering the CC0603KRX7R8BB104 as a potential choice to ensure that its performance matches their specific requirements.

More News
A detailed technical review of the TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF Drum Core Wirewound Inductor, focusing on its performance analysis, impedance, inductance, series resistance, and other vital parameters.
TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF: A Comprehensive Technical Review of a Competitive Drum Core Wirewound Inductor
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
Explore the performance and characteristics of the TDK Corporation VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 drum core wirewound inductor in this in-depth technical review.
TDK Corporation's VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 Inductor: A Comprehensive Technical Review
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
A comprehensive technical review on the Pulse Electronics 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT inductor, focusing on performance, impedance, inductance, and other important parameters for engineers.
Unlocking the Potential of Pulse Electronics' 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT Inductor: A Performance Analysis
Tuesday, May 30, 2023