Reviews & Analysis

Yageo's CC0603KRX7R7BB104: Performance Analysis of 100n Ceramic X7R Capacitor

By Mark Harris Thursday, 23 March 2023

Explore the performance characteristics of the Yageo 100n Ceramic X7R Capacitor (CC0603KRX7R7BB104) in this in-depth technical review. Learn about its impedance, capacitance, series resistance, dissipation factor, and quality factor, and see how it stacks up against other capacitors in the market. Engineers and circuit designers won't want to miss this valuable insight in making an informed decision for their projects.

Introduction

In this technical review, we will thoroughly analyze the performance of Yageo's CC0603KRX7R7BB104, a surface-mount Ceramic X7R capacitor with a nominal value of 100nF, a tolerance of ±10%, and a voltage rating of 16V. This in-depth review will compare the performance of this capacitor with statistical benchmark data derived from similar components and address engineers who are assessing this capacitor for suitability in their circuits.

Pros:

  • Wide range of test frequencies, providing more detailed information about the capacitor's performance
  • Consistent series capacitance values at 1 Volt, suggesting stability at low voltages

Cons:

  • At higher test frequencies, there is a visible increase in dissipation factor and decrease in quality factor compared to the benchmark data
  • At 10 Volts, there is a noticeable increase in series resistance and decrease in series capacitance throughout the test frequency range

Impedance

The Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 Ceramic Capacitor's impedance performance was evaluated and compared to a statistical benchmark of capacitors with the same nominal value. At lower frequencies, such as 5 kHz and 10 kHz, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 exhibits slightly higher impedance values of 323.5 kΩ and 162.2 kΩ, respectively, when compared to the average impedance values of the benchmark. However, as the frequency increases, this component's impedance remains within the average impedance range. For example, at 50 kHz and 100 kHz, its impedance values are 32.64 kΩ and 16.37 kΩ, respectively, which fall between the minimum and maximum impedance values of the statistical benchmark.

At higher frequencies, the component also demonstrates expected impedance values within the average range of the benchmark. For instance, at 200 kHz, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 has an impedance value of 8.946 kΩ, which falls between 8.241 kΩ and 12.49 kΩ from the benchmark. This trend continues across other frequencies, ranging from 300 kHz to 1 MHz, indicating the capacitor's consistency in performance in the impedance response across a wide frequency range. This good performance and impedance consistency make the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 Capacitor an appropriate choice for applications where a reliable impedance response is required.

The measured impedance values of the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 at 10 volts further demonstrate the component's competitive impedance performance in comparison to the statistical benchmark. For example, the capacitor exhibits impedance values of 26.91 kΩ at 50 kHz, 13.49 kΩ at 100 kHz, and 2.713 kΩ at 500 kHz, all of which are below the benchmark values. As the frequency increases, its impedance remains within the lower range levels of the benchmark, showcasing its overall consistent performance in various frequency conditions. This competitive impedance performance makes the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 an excellent candidate for a wide range of electronics engineering applications, ensuring reliable operation and optimal performance.

Capacitance

Upon testing the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor in various scenarios, it has been found that at 1 Volt test frequency, the measured series capacitance values vary from 87.01nF (1MHz) to 98.4nF (5Hz). For comparison purposes, the standard minimum, average, and maximum capacitance benchmark values range between 56.08nF and 115nF. In light of this comparison, the Yageo capacitor exhibits superior performance across all test frequencies, as its measured capacitance consistently falls between the average and maximum benchmark values.

When the test voltage is increased to 10 Volts, the Yageo capacitor displays a noticeable growth in capacitance, ranging from 87.01nF (1MHz) to 119.4nF (5Hz). This behavior can be attributed to the nonlinear voltage-dependence of ceramic capacitors, which is a common characteristic of this component type. With reference to the test data obtained at lower voltage (1V), results at 10V not only show a consistent increase in capacitance but also a consistent pattern of capacitance values across various test frequencies. This similarity in results indicates that the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor is capable of maintaining stability and performance across different voltage levels, making it a reliable choice for various applications.

It's important to understand the significance of capacitance stability in electronic systems, as it can greatly affect the overall performance of a circuit. For instance, when a capacitor is utilized in a voltage regulator or a filter application, the stability of the capacitance will directly influence the efficiency and reliability of the system. A capacitor with stable capacitance over a range of voltage levels and frequencies ensures better performance and a longer lifespan for the device in which it is implemented.

Series Resistance

An important aspect of a capacitor's performance is its series resistance, also referred to as Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR). The series resistance for the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 at 1V ranges from a minimum of 5.389kΩ at 5Hz to as low as 34.5mΩ at 1MHz. Throughout the frequency spectrum, the series resistance of this capacitor is generally lower than the average resistance of the benchmark data, making it comparably advantageous. For example, at 100Hz, the capacitor's series resistance is 258Ω, while the benchmark average is considerably higher, at 444.7Ω. Similarly, at 500Hz and 10kHz, the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 records a series resistance of 53.9Ω and 2.921Ω compared to 91.81Ω and 5.163Ω as per the benchmark, respectively.

However, it is important to mention that the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 doesn't always demonstrate a better series resistance compared to the maximum observed resistance across the frequency range in the benchmark data set. This indicates that there may be cases where other capacitors might perform better in terms of ESR.

When examining the capacitor's performance at 10V, a similar trend is noticed. At various frequencies, the capacitor showcases lower series resistance compared to the benchmark average. For example, at 100kHz, the capacitor's series resistance sits at 542.2mΩ, which is significantly lower than the benchmark average of 1.482Ω. On the other hand, at lower frequencies like 5Hz and 10Hz, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 series resistance at 10V is higher (15.28kΩ and 7.568kΩ), compared to the benchmark average (8.751kΩ and 4.329kΩ), respectively.

This comprehensive analysis indicates that the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor delivers relatively favorable performance in terms of series resistance compared to the benchmark data. It is especially beneficial at higher frequencies or under lower voltage conditions. Nonetheless, a thorough assessment of various factors should be conducted before determining its suitability for specific applications. This review of the capacitor's ESR should provide a solid foundation for understanding its performance and potential as an electronic component.

Dissipation Factor and Quality Factor

For the Yageo CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor, we will analyze the LCR measurements at 1 Volt. Carefully examining the dissipation factor (Df) and quality factor (Q), we observe essential information about the capacitor's energy loss characteristics and efficiency. A capacitor with a low Df value indicates higher efficiency as it dissipates less energy during its operation, translating to lower energy loss due to its internal resistance.

In this case, at a test frequency of 5 kHz, the capacitor exhibits a Df of 0.017 and a Q of 60.05, while at a higher test frequency of 100 kHz, it demonstrates a slightly lower Df of 0.014 and an increased Q of 71.36. Upon analyzing at even higher frequencies, such as 1 MHz, we observe a slight increase in the Df to 0.019 and a decrease in Q to 52.57. These results imply that the capacitor is capable of dissipating less energy at its nominal test frequency (100 kHz). When compared to the statistical benchmark data, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 shows relatively lower Df values, which are desirable and signify a more efficient capacitor.

When the capacitor is tested at a higher voltage of 10 Volts, we notice an overall increase in the Df values, displaying the capacitor's performance at different voltage levels. For instance, at a 10 kHz test frequency with 10 Volts, the Df value is 0.057, and the Q value is 17.66. However, at the same frequency of 10 kHz but with a lower voltage applied of 1 Volt, the Df value drops to 0.016, and the Q value increases to 62.64. Comparing to the benchmark dataset, the capacitor's performance corresponds well with the desired Q values at 10 Volts, which showcase the component's practical utility and resilience.

Understanding the relationship between the dissipation factor (Df) and the quality factor (Q) allows us to evaluate a capacitor's suitability and robustness within its intended application. This information, combined with other essential parameters like capacitance and equivalent series resistance (ESR), can provide a comprehensive understanding of the capacitor's overall performance and ability to efficiently perform in various circuits and electronic devices.

Comparative Analysis

The CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor from Yageo clearly demonstrates mixed performance when compared with the provided statistical benchmark data for components of the same nominal value. Its performance appears to be relatively strong at certain test frequencies, while in others, it underperforms.

Observing the performance of the component at 1 Volt, it performs better at high test frequencies (150 kHz to 1 MHz) in terms of impedance, typically delivering values lower than the average impedance presented in the benchmark. However, at lower test frequencies (5 kHz to 100 kHz), the impedance yields higher numbers compared to the benchmark's average. Exceptionally positive is the dissipation factor (DF) of the component, where it scores notably below the benchmark average for most test frequencies. On the other hand, its quality factor (Q) is considerably lower than the benchmark average, especially for frequencies between 5 kHz and 100 kHz.

In terms of the component's performance at 10 Volts, the impedance scores are largely in line with the benchmark statistical data. Nevertheless, it is crucial to mention that the capacitor's dissipation factor (DF) is markedly higher than the statistical benchmark, indicating a less desirable performance across all test frequencies. The quality factor (Q) comparison exhibits diverse results; for frequencies below 20 kHz, the component's Q values are significantly below some of the observed benchmark averages. In contrast, for frequency values ranging from 50 kHz to 1 MHz, the component's Q values are higher than the maximum Q values of the benchmark data, which denotes better performance.

Considering the capacitive aspects, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor presents a higher average series capacitance across its testing frequencies at both 1 Volt and 10 Volts, compared to the benchmark series capacitance. This might be of interest for engineers seeking a higher capacitance ceramic capacitor in the X7R category with part number CC0603KRX7R7BB104.

Electronics engineers will need to carefully decide based on the intended applications, individual requirements, and specific frequency requirements. The capacitor may be applicable for some circuits where the impedance, DF, Q or higher capacitance deviance is acceptable from the average or desired in the observed range. However, it may be wise to research alternative capacitors for circuits where performance at lower test frequencies and higher quality factors are important criteria, for instance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, after an extensive examination of the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor from Yageo, we find that it demonstrates both commendable and subpar performance compared to the statistical benchmark data. The Z5U composition of this capacitor adds to the robustness of the part with an added advantage of maintaining impressive stability over a wide temperature range.

With respect to impedance, the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 experiences better performance in the lower frequency range; however, the performance deviates from the benchmark and tends to display suboptimal impedance at the higher frequency range. Additionally, the component's series resistance portrays acceptable characteristics with slight variations in the lower and higher frequency range when juxtaposed to the average values in the benchmark data.

On the other hand, the capacitor registers a marginal deviation from the benchmark data when considering the dissipation and quality factors. It is noteworthy that the behavior of the capacitor's capacitance with test frequency is at par with the average values of the statistical benchmark.

While the CC0603KRX7R7BB104 capacitor does not exhibit flawless performance overall, it may fit certain applications and circuits that can leverage the strong suits of this component. Comparison against the benchmark data provides valuable information for engineers evaluating this capacitor for integration into their designs, ensuring an informed decision-making process.

More News
A detailed technical review of the TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF Drum Core Wirewound Inductor, focusing on its performance analysis, impedance, inductance, series resistance, and other vital parameters.
TDK Corporation SLF6028T-4R7M1R6-PF: A Comprehensive Technical Review of a Competitive Drum Core Wirewound Inductor
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
Explore the performance and characteristics of the TDK Corporation VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 drum core wirewound inductor in this in-depth technical review.
TDK Corporation's VLCF4028T-4R7N1R5-2 Inductor: A Comprehensive Technical Review
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
A comprehensive technical review on the Pulse Electronics 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT inductor, focusing on performance, impedance, inductance, and other important parameters for engineers.
Unlocking the Potential of Pulse Electronics' 4.7µH PA4331.472NLT Inductor: A Performance Analysis
Tuesday, May 30, 2023